Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all Read/WriteWeb posts

• Do those figures indicate, nearly 50 million users and 35 million have at least 1 friend. That leaves 15 million accounts with no friends.

  30% of social network users arn`t sociable!

  Posted by: BarryO | July 30, 2008 1:47 AM





• Women are the future of mankind !
  It is funny, because the only networks where male dominates is "linkedin".
  Hey guys, there is a life outiside business!

  Posted by: stetoscope | July 30, 2008 2:23 AM





• Do we know how many of these women are fake? Because I think some of them are!

  Posted by: Bastien | July 30, 2008 4:49 AM





• Great study that "sort-of" confirms what I've always felt -that social networks were created by geeks to attract girls (not unlike a cool science project in high school). Guys then show up (because the women are there) but ultimately get bored and leave because of all the socializing.

  Social Networks = shopping with your girlfriend AND her girlfriend

  Social Networks = Disco (which still sucks)

  Women like to dance... most men don't but because they like women so they teach themselves a few moves...

  Posted by: chris | July 30, 2008 4:59 AM





• Great take on the study. I also wanted to point out that at least the crazy habits of technology community are not really mainstream - the number of people who have over 1,000 friends on social networks is not that high at all and the majority of people that only have 2-25 friends must actually be connected to these friends in real life. So it kind of proves that social networking still serves its initial purpose of connecting friends.

  Posted by: Svetlana Gladkova   | July 30, 2008 5:44 AM





• As a chatroom user, women indeed dominate, all of the chatrooms I've been. Sites such as wireclub.com has a easy "create chatrooms" feature and experience tells me that male creators don't get much visitors.

  Back to topic, I've also have this idea that females tend to have more male "friends" or how the invite button describes it.

  Social Networks just have the satisfaction of males and females saying "hey, I've got 'insert girl name', how good am I? " or "check this guy out, he's got a bunch of girl friends, he must be some guy". *cough*

  Posted by: Coldwave | July 30, 2008 7:53 AM





• A few comments on this study. If you link back to the actual page on the study at RapLeaf, you'll see there is very little data given on the methodology of the survey. They don't tell you how they acquired the data, this is very important as if they simply queried the social networks by searching their account data the results will be heavily biased toward women because many of these social networks are immediate targets of bot account creators.

  Myspace was particularly susceptible to this prior to their implementation of Captch challanges between various actions on the site (sending emails etc.) even after this there are still bots with human assistance. It appears individuals are creating multiple fake female accounts and using them to mine male users for the purpose of directing them to outside sites or to get their private email data. Unlike the completely automated bots of 10 years ago these are real people that perform the functions that the bots could not normally do. I suspect that a large chunk of the female numbers on these social networks represent bots. It would be interesting to see a study done that tries to filter for automated accounts, I suspect that the results would reveal a larger percentage of males on all the sites than females.

  Posted by: sent2null | July 30, 2008 11:18 AM





• Ahh the internet, where the men are men, the women are men, and the children are FBI agents.

  Posted by: Chris Blalock | July 30, 2008 11:33 AM





• I figured that the females especially the younger ones outnumbered the males. Nice post, that's a ton of information.

  Posted by: World's craziest email | July 30, 2008 12:17 PM





• What's interesting here for me is not so much the stats themselves, but the societal implications of the data.

  If social networks are evolving the ways in which we communicate, and social networks are dominated by women, then the communications of our society are going to be significantly altered by the strong female influence.

  Broadcast communications are founded on traditionally male communication principles: reach, authority, fact-seeking. Social networks are founded upon female communcation principles: collaboration, participation and sharing. As social networks continue to gain traction, we are going to see a cultural shift that will impact decision-making and leadership structures.

  I will blog about this at some point in the future.

  Posted by: MiXTMedia | July 30, 2008 12:26 PM





• woah really? what a magical study. considering that i can come to that conclusion based on 3 simple parameters:

  
  1.- 60% of the world population are women
  2.- the most engaging new group of internet users are stay at home moms (this is known since 2005)
  3.- Women like to socialize more than men

  
  = women dominate in terms of engagement social networking and blogging.

  i thought that was common knowledge by now.

  Posted by: Avatar | July 30, 2008 2:34 PM





• Women outnumber men on social network because most of the women today is passionate about internet chatting and always looking for a groups that they can interact and communicate well.

  Posted by: seo | July 31, 2008 12:59 AM





• one third without friend, that's surprising as all these services are a bit boring without a community

  Posted by: nicolas dengler   | July 31, 2008 2:28 AM





• Women vs. Men? Whatever. The statistic I find most intriguing is the nearly 9,000 LinkedIn users who are under 18! Who are these kids, and how can I get them to influence my little sister?

  Posted by: Travis Seitler   | July 31, 2008 1:41 PM





• so if men are more powerful in the world, what does that say about social networks?

  Posted by: Noah David Simon | July 31, 2008 6:24 PM





• well,before i forget ineed to know how i get to the english version form.

  Posted by: idi owor | August 4, 2008 4:00 AM





• This does not tell us much new, as said in above comments.

  If men are more powerful in the world, this tells us that social networks are more frequently used by powerless people :-)

  Posted by: Akku | August 5, 2008 11:05 AM





• Insightful visualization of Rapleaf's data at http://www.mininglabs.com/2008/08/05/digging-through-rapleaf%E2%80%99s-study-on-gender-and-age-in-social-networks/

  Posted by: aldo max | August 8, 2008 6:00 PM