The Old Dull Thing Is The New Shiny Thing (or deconstructing the Calacanis email newsletter)

Jul 13th, 2008 | By Steven Hodson | Category: The Social Web

Prior to Web 2.0 and the rapid proliferation of things like blogs, social media and social networks the most common way to communicate with people was by using newsletters. While one could manually update static web pages things like newsletters were easily created and could be sent en mass to the people who had signed up to receive them. One of the best known cases of people who used this medium for me had to be Chris Pirillo who calacanis1even wrote a book about it at one time as being the most powerful medium of communication.

With the advent of Web 2.0 and all the easy to publish methods that allowed for mass communication newsletters from the movers and shakers of the Internet began a slow decline in popularity. One of the early adopters of blogging of course was Jason Calacanis who says that blogging is dead and has returned to the email newsletter format for his more intimate conversation that he feels has gone MIA in our Web 2.0 world.

Now many of us on the [nw] web have [nw] called bullshit [nw] on this announcement that Calacanis has retired from blogging [nw] and plans on limiting his conversation to a selective list of 500 750 1,000 1,100 newsletter subscribers. However as we were informed by Robert Scoble on FriendFeed he has received the first of Jason’s newsletters which he then posted on his posterous blog [nw] and I am sure it is getting a lot of traffic at this point.

Personally I think Jason is full of shit on this retirement thing but I thought I would take a look at this new and intimate newsletter and see what it had to say and guess what – it’s just a continuation of his last blog post along with some back patting on how a head of the curve he is by doing this. I also thought it would be interesting to take some of the things he said in this news letter and see how high the bullshit meter goes.

He starts out the newsletter with a couple of paragraphs of discounting the idea that this was all a joke and then gets to the gist of the inaugural newsletter with this

Is blogging dead?
————————-
Yes, it is. Officially. :-)

Okay folks it’s official we can all hang up out blogs as a waste of time and go onto other things because Jason says so. Wow that’s a hellva responsibility to take on there Jason – being the arbiter of a whole medium’s validity.

He then follows that up with

Bloggers spend more time digging, tweeting, and SEOing their posts
than they do on the posts themselves. In the early days of blogging
Peter Rojas, who was my blog professor, told me what was required to
win at blogging: “show up every day.” In 2003 and 2004 that was the
case. Today? What’s required is a team of social marketers to get your
message out there, and a second one to manage the fall-out from
whatever you’ve said.

Well Jason you may have been concerned with SEO and digg points or felt you needed to hire a bunch of experts in the social media field (the field you yourself felt you were knowledgeable so many times) but to suggest that this is something that all bloggers concern themselves with is just assuming too damn much. I have been doing this for some time and I couldn’t give a damn about SEO or whether I’ve been on digg or whether I have the most followers on Twitter. There are a lot of bloggers out there who I am sure feel exactly the same way and for you to paint all bloggers with this paintbrush is in a way rather insulting.

Of course there is the obligatory swipe at Nick Denton and his Enquirer style of blogging across all his properties. Here’s a hint Jason – not all bloggers are cut from the same cloth. Nor do we all hop on the link bait train as he likes to suggest we do

Excelling in blogging today is about link-baiting, the act of writing
something inflammatory in order to get a link. Many folks say I’m
responsible for link-baiting–these people are absolute idiots. I’ve
never tried to get any of these insecure, lonely freaks to link to
something I’ve said. :-)

Just look at any of the really excellent bloggers out there like Alexander van Elsas, Sprague D and right through to the old timers like Mathew Ingram shows just how wrong Jason is and the fact is the accusations of him link baiting have a lot more validity than him accusing other bloggers doing it.

He then raises the specter of how mean the blogosphere has become by trotting out the whole Xeni and Boing Boing episode which I note like most of the newsletter he does very linking to prove his point(s). Get a grip Jason – nastiness isn’t something that is specific to the blogosphere. People can and very often are very nasty – it doesn’t matter if they are being such on the Internet or even in real life – we will always have nasty people who like nothing better than to belittle and berate those who they don’t like.

In the section where he tries to explain why the switch to email and his rebuttal against the meanness of the blogosphere Jason writes

Why should we all build our homes and give residence to the trolls
under them? Comments on blogs inevitably implode, and we all accept it
under the belief that “open is better!” Open is not better. Running a
blog is like letting a virtuoso play for 90 minutes are Carnegie Hall,
and then seconds after their performance you run to the back Alley and
grab the most inebriated homeless person drag them on stage and ask
them what they think of the performance they overheard in the Alley.
They then take a piss on the stage and say “F-you” to the people who
just had a wonderful experience for 90 or 92 minutes. That’s openness
for you… my how far we’ve come! We’ve put the wisdom of the deranged
on the same level as the wisdom of the wise.

Get out and stay out

Sorry Jason just like in my home I will not allow bad behavior the same applies to my blog and that is where being an administrator or caretaker of your home of thoughts comes in. It is our responsibility to stand up and eject those who would come on our blogs and spread hateful things. If you feel that someone has written something mean and nasty then fucking well delete it - don’t go whining about how nasty people are. Just because a person can’t be bothered to become involved in their blog beyond firing off a post then it is their own faults for this type of thing to happen and continue. If I was the stage manager in your example I would have booted the drunk off and seriously consider doing the same to the person who brought the drunk in. Don’t pass the blame for your own inability to manage your blog on others.

The fact is that in my opinion Jason really found himself not the center of attention that he once might have been when there weren’t so many really good and intelligent bloggers out there. That is of course the advantage of being an early adopter – the level of competition – getting those eyeballs – is a lot less but there are better alternatives out there now compared to the nonsense that could be found on Jason’s blog lately. Now though the quality level of the blogosphere is rising regardless of things like Valleywag or blogs like it and Jason was finding himself being sidelined which wouldn’t sit well for a man with the ego of Jason Calacanis.

So he decides to paint everyone in the blogosphere with the same paintbrush and calling us all losers and useless in the process. Well all I can say is that no newsletter is going to make him anymore relevant. The fact is that in the end he will end up losing real feedback because he has decided to shut out any and all dissenting voices. In exchange he is filling his world with nothing less than a bunch of people who agree with him and nobody learns anything of value when they do this.

Instead of trying to work towards making something better Jason retreated to a world where he is once again the king.

Enjoy your personal echo chamber Jason because the rest of us have moved on.

Tags: , ,
  • July 13, 2008 at 4:31 pm Sprague D
    Steven, I've always been wary of JC's commitment to blogging since I saw him chastising his readers by turning off comments if they were critical. After his big blog payout, he seems to have used his site primarily as a way to promote his businesses and tease Nick Denton. Guess he got bored. (p.s., thanks for the shout out).
  • July 13, 2008 at 4:38 pm Steven Hodson
    @Sprague .. more than welcome and even though I don't have the same pull as Scoble or Louis I would highly suggest people subscribe to Sprague's blog - A Diary of a Rat (man I love the name for a blog LOL)
  • July 13, 2008 at 4:42 pm Robert Seidman
    Sprague. I've never been wary to Jason's commitment to the love of connectivity. He really loves it.
  • July 13, 2008 at 4:43 pm Dobromir Hadzhiev
    did just a few minutes ago, thanks for the recommendation Steven
  • July 13, 2008 at 4:48 pm Steven Hodson
    hmmm .... Jason liking this .... hmmmm :)
  • July 13, 2008 at 4:56 pm Mark Forman
    Meh-another windbag sniffing his own farts.
  • July 13, 2008 at 6:39 pm Mark Dykeman
    Steven, could you start deciphering S. Gillmor next? That would be a good public service.
  • July 13, 2008 at 6:54 pm Soulhuntre
    Jasons problem with blogging is basically that the masses have stopping giving him the worship he was so clearly looking for. An echo chamber is perfect for him now. Beside that - he knows the emails will be posted to the 'net - so it is basically a blog anyway. What did Jason really blog about except poker and how much money his car cost? Honestly that stuff makes a amusing microblog blog but a lousy PR platform - which is what he wanted it to be.
  • July 13, 2008 at 6:55 pm Steve Spalding
    Am I the only one who is curious to see how this plays out in 6 months time? There are three parts to any magic trick -- the pledge, the turn and the prestige. At best we're at the turn.
  • July 13, 2008 at 7:05 pm Karim
    Steven Hodson, I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. lol
  • July 13, 2008 at 7:07 pm Eric Rice
    Great, now measure the return, sucka!
  • July 13, 2008 at 7:09 pm Thomas B
    @Steven yeah, I was a little surprised to see Jason Calacanis on the like list
  • July 13, 2008 at 7:10 pm Steven Hodson
    @Mark - I don't have good enough drugs to do that - sorry
  • July 13, 2008 at 7:14 pm Steven Hodson
    @Karim - sorry but I'm just a old fashion cranky old fart who only has a blog and not one of these shiny new things called a newsletter :)
  • July 13, 2008 at 7:23 pm Mark Dykeman
    @Steven - actually, that was a cheap shot I took at Steve Gillmor, in retrospect. I did take some time to read through one of his more recent posts and, after a few reads, I think he had a valid point. However, his writing style is definitely at odds with the idea injection method used in a lot of blogging these days.
  • July 13, 2008 at 7:24 pm Sprague D
    +1 Steve S, for referencing one of the best movies ever. Now back to the topic at hand...
  • July 13, 2008 at 11:02 pm Steven Hodson
    WTF is that crap SPAMMER ALERT .. I'm leaving that in place so everyone can see and then block this guy's ass .. SPAMMER ALERT
  • July 13, 2008 at 11:02 pm Shey
  • July 13, 2008 at 11:31 pm Steven Hodson
    @Shey - thanks -- I saw that thread go by but was caught up with other things and it didn't register .. f*cking spamming idiots
  • July 15, 2008 at 7:08 am Frans
    It is really pointless if people do something like this. http://www.calacanismail.com He basically silo'd himself in a shrinking echo chamber, at some point he will need to get out and get some fresh new people's opinions on his writing, or else he will just become (even more) the preacher who preaches to the choir.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    I must be some sort of rabid communicator. I blog and send out a periodic newsletter. It started as a way to share links and random weirdness with certain friends of mine, all of whom I knew through various forums; they all know me but they don't all know each other. Some don't "do" blogs, so I wanted to find another way to stay in touch. I have a copy of Chris' book on newsletters, that's what inspired me (bias alert: he's a very good friend of mine, but I would have bought the book anyway). It's mostly techy but I have strayed into philosophy as well.

    Like you said, blogging, for me, has always been done to satisfy a passion, not pay the bills. That's true of the newsletter as well. I don't travel in the circles of people who garner attention for switching back to the old form. I'm not on Jason's mailing list. I don't think I'd want to be. His world isn't my world, and I consider newsletters more personal than blogs. As to content, between push and pull, I'd rather pull with my blogs. Newsletters are for pushing.
    • ^
    • v
    Since you see discussion on posts going away to other places - does it matter if the topic of discussion starts on a blog or a newsletter?

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus